Part V: A page on W.A.G.E. (valued at approx. $93.75)

Eleanor Ivory Weber

Many people will already have heard about Working Artists and the Greater Economy (W.A.G.E.), a New York-based organisation ‘focused on regulating the payment of artist fees by nonprofit art institutions and establishing a sustainable model for best practices between artists and the institutions that contract their labor.’[1]

Operational since 2008, W.A.G.E. have recently garnered increased attention through various e-flux advertisements, through Artists Space in New York City gaining W.A.G.E. Certification, and through their ante upping campaign ‘Wages 4 W.A.G.E.’, a crowd-fundraiser to finance their own work. Very aware of the often un- or lowly-paid status of arts workers, W.A.G.E.’s mission is that artists and curators are paid to an extent commensurate with the earnings of the institutions employing them. Crucial to their project is the understanding that the work we do is work, and therefore wage-worthy. In other words, generating symbolic or cultural capital in the hope that – one day, maybe, if we’re lucky – it will turn into ‘real’ capital is all well and good, but one must ask: who is profiting from poverty or indebtedness in the name of ‘non-profit’ creativity and art market speculation?


As mentioned above, W.A.G.E. focuses primarily on the nonprofit sector. One mustn’t forget that this does not solely include artist-run initiatives, project spaces, independent websites and publications, etc., but also many museums, mid-size institutions and even private foundations. Claiming to be ‘not-for-profit’ has become the norm rather than the exception; if nothing else, as a way of legitimising one’s institution, whatever the scale, as one worthy being paid attention. How distasteful to admit openly you are in it for-profit, that you would stoop so low as to care about earning money from your work! If the labour of love is enough, the buck has to stop when the other ‘lovers’ (CEOs, board members, employees, etc.) are cheating.

Perhaps a question we really should be asking is what we mean when we say ‘profit’. In a global economy where the binary of credit and debt, surplus and deficit are the defining existential and social categories across all sectors and all facets of life, we need to query these words’ common use, why their meaning goes so boldly unquestioned.

Somehow, maybe by osmosis, we learn that claiming to be ‘for-profit’ would be symbolic suicide. This will certainly be the case as long as we trick ourselves into upholding an art economy whose highest value is the idea that artists and creatives work uniquely because of desire and will, rather than for money. It’s funny that we can maintain this suspension of disbelief, considering the proliferation of art schools, the professionalization of artists via endless training, the excess of curators, writers and administrators of art (all post-tertiary educated), not to mention the art market’s increasing virility and its according pressure on ever-younger artists to make work to the taste of flipping collectors.

What the ethics to already underpaid workers funding other underpaid workers to advocate for changed labour-relations are, is debatable. Nevertheless, it’s very clear this is a topic that needs to be put front and centre of all of our relations with institutions, other artists/curators/writers, and with ourselves. Although W.A.G.E. is obviously a US-oriented model, similar dynamics, and a similar need for action occur globally.

The question needs to be begged, we can’t just assume the ethics are on the side of nonprofit. There are material expenses such as rent, food, travel and research that cannot go ignored. Every time, we should think: What is my ethic when it comes to paying/being paid? Will I work for free? Under what conditions will I work for free? For how long? And, finally, why?

If nothing else, refuse to be ashamed for mentioning money: ‘Is there a fee?’ is not a dirty line. Putting money on the proverbial table makes for healthier conversations, better relations. We can’t all hide under the veil of financial speculation and self-investment – its logic is twisted, it will only ever work for the few. Why do we as in industry allow so much devalued labour to occur, when we see ourselves as some of the most liberated of the social strata, when some of the richest people in the world ‘own’ art?


[1] W.A.G.E.’s mission:
[2] W.A.G.E.’s full wo/manifesto available here:

News Archive

Tribunal: a review

Callout: Runway issue #32[RE/PRODUCTION]

On the threatened closure of Sydney College of the Arts

In Response: A carving out of space that is designed to end

In Response: Community, Criticality and Play

In Response: Strength in ARI Diversity

Callout: Runway issue #31[WEST]

In Response: Revisiting a Melbourne Perspective

“The party becomes the site of knowing”: on the Brisbane sharehouse ARI

The Lifecycle and Deathcycle of ARIs

One year in an ARI

Balancing on the Edge: A Melbourne Perspective

Les Bijoux Indiscrets

On the marginalisation of female pleasure

An account of my encounters with porn

Introducing our guest blogger for issue #29[PORN]: Emily Post Coitus

On Reenacting ‘Dream Merchant’


Conversations 6

Conversations 5

Conversations 4

Conversations 3

Runway is looking for 4 new board members for 2016!

Conversations 2

Conversations 1


Lauren Reid and Vaida Stepanovaité discuss the Project Space Festival in Berlin

The Politics of Listening

A list of other jobs artists do to support their careers as artists.

Australian Artist Run Initiatives condemn cuts to the Australia Council for the Arts

Amina McConvell’s hypnogogic manifestations



Perth Amboy

Stuart Highway





Henley Golf Club

Moira National Park

An unusual way of doing politics: Alex Martinis Roe


Constructions of the ‘We’

Rights of Nature

The Government Machine


Part VIII: One for the money

Keyboard mash (Caps lock on): Terrence Combos


The Next Big Thing: Reserve your Runway 2014 Artist Edition today

PRESS RELEASE: Become a Founding Member of the Runway Funding Circle

Part VI: Notes on Society, with Susan Gibb

Art can make you soft again: spotlight on Rosie Deacon

Part V: A page on W.A.G.E. (valued at approx. $93.75)

PRESS RELEASE: Runway announces first Annual Commission by Sydney emerging artist Rosie Deacon

Part IV: Some smiles for the Economic Frown

Runway is growing: Callout for new board members

Part III: What is this thing called work?

Regional Contemporary Art Network

Part II: Eyes on the prize

Part I: Lazzarato’s ‘Indebted Man’


Introducing guest blogger Eleanor Ivory Weber

“Die Sonne kommt näher”: Otto Piene’s More Sky in Berlin

Fuzzy Logic: Talking Big Data and the Aesthetics of the Infinitely Small at CMA2014

The Pale Fox – Camille Henrot in Copenhagen

Kiribati – Putting a Face to Climate Change

The Flux of Space: Berlin’s Project Space Festival

Guest Editor for Runway Issue#25 – Andrew Hurle

Callout for Runway Issue #25 [MONEY]

8 Propositions for Islands: Part 8

8 Propositions for Islands: Part 7 // Becoming Post-nissological

8 Propositions for Islands: Coda // Those Who Stay

8 Propositions for Islands // Part 5: Island as Island

8 Propositions for Islands // Part 4: Plinth as Island

8 Propositions for Islands // Part 3: Queer Performance as Archipelago

8 Propositions for Islands // Part 2: Stage as Island

8 Propositions for Islands // Part 1: Artist as Island

A Discourse on Prototyping, War Crimes and Artistic Practice

Callout for Issue #24 [ISLANDS]

It’s launch day!

Out with Outsider Art?

21st Century Artist conference, Artspace Sydney, October 2013

Runway’s New Adventure


Search Runway